Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 22:31:31 GMT -5
As stated, she was frightened, constantly cried, hid behind the door, for these reasons, the defendant mother used her rights arising from personal relationships contrary to her purpose and obligations, instead of exercising her right to file a custody change case, and this situation was proven by witness statements and the criminal court decision. It was understood that they did not take the common child out to hide it during the time they were with them, and as a result of all these events, the physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development of the common child was in danger. In the face of this situation, taking into account that the establishment of a personal relationship between the common child and the mother can always be re-evaluated according to changing conditions, it was decided to abolish the personal relationship between the common child and the defendant mother at this stage in line with the best interests of the child, but the establishment of a written provision was not deemed correct and required reversal.
Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil France Telegram Number Data Chamber, 01.06.2020, 2020/1370 E., 2020/2447 K. As stated, she was frightened, constantly cried, hid behind the door, for these reasons, the defendant mother used her rights arising from personal relationships contrary to her purpose and obligations, instead of exercising her right to file a custody change case, and this situation was proven by witness statements and the criminal court decision. It was understood that they did not take the common child out to hide it during the time they were with them, and as a result of all these events, the physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development of the common child was in danger.
In the face of this situation, taking into account that the establishment of a personal relationship between the common child and the mother can always be re-evaluated according to changing conditions, it was decided to abolish the personal relationship between the common child and the defendant mother at this stage in line with the best interests of the child, but the establishment of a written provision was not deemed correct and required reversal. . Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 01.06.2020, 2020/1370 E., 2020/2447 K.
Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil France Telegram Number Data Chamber, 01.06.2020, 2020/1370 E., 2020/2447 K. As stated, she was frightened, constantly cried, hid behind the door, for these reasons, the defendant mother used her rights arising from personal relationships contrary to her purpose and obligations, instead of exercising her right to file a custody change case, and this situation was proven by witness statements and the criminal court decision. It was understood that they did not take the common child out to hide it during the time they were with them, and as a result of all these events, the physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development of the common child was in danger.
In the face of this situation, taking into account that the establishment of a personal relationship between the common child and the mother can always be re-evaluated according to changing conditions, it was decided to abolish the personal relationship between the common child and the defendant mother at this stage in line with the best interests of the child, but the establishment of a written provision was not deemed correct and required reversal. . Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 01.06.2020, 2020/1370 E., 2020/2447 K.